CFO vs FD in a Scaling Business
At some point in most growing businesses, somebody asks the question almost in passing. Should we be calling this a CFO role, or is it still a Finance Director job? It usually comes up when a vacancy needs writing, or when the board is discussing what the finance function needs to look like next year, and it is asked more often than it is actually answered properly.
Part of the difficulty is that the two titles have become genuinely blurred in UK business. Plenty of FDs do work that would sit comfortably under a CFO title elsewhere. Plenty of CFOs are doing what is, in substance, an FD job with a more senior-sounding name attached to it. So the question is rarely as simple as picking the right label. It is really a question about what the business needs the finance function to do over the next two or three years, and whether the person in the role is being asked to run finance or to help shape the business.
What an FD is actually there to do
A Finance Director, in most scaling businesses, is the person who makes sure the finance function works. Management accounts arrive on time and are accurate. Cash flow is understood and managed. Budgets are built, tracked and explained when they go off course. Statutory accounts and audit are handled properly. Systems and processes get tighter as the business grows rather than more chaotic. This is not a junior job. A good FD in a business turning over twenty or thirty million pounds is doing something genuinely difficult, and doing it well is the difference between a finance function that gives everyone confidence and one that quietly creates risk nobody has noticed yet.
What an FD is not typically expected to do, at least not as the centre of their role, is sit at the table for decisions about where the business is going next. They might contribute to that conversation. They are not usually the person driving it.
Building a leadership team?
What changes when the role becomes a CFO role
The CFO title tends to get used, properly rather than just decoratively, when the finance leader's job stops being purely about running finance well and starts being about shaping the commercial direction of the business. That shift usually shows up in a few recognisable ways.
The business has external investors, or is about to, and someone needs to own the relationship with them, present the numbers credibly and answer hard questions about the model rather than just the figures. The business is heading toward a transaction, whether that is raising a round, refinancing, or starting to think about an eventual sale, and needs someone who has actually been through that process before rather than learning it for the first time under pressure. The finance function itself has grown to the point where it needs leading rather than just running, with a team beneath the top role that needs managing, developing and holding accountable. Or the board increasingly wants the finance leader in the room for decisions about pricing, market entry, M&A and capital allocation, not just reporting on what already happened.
None of this means the CFO has stopped caring about the management accounts being accurate. It means that is no longer the most important thing they do.
Where businesses get this wrong
The most common mistake is not actually choosing the wrong title. It is hiring against the wrong job description, regardless of what it says at the top of the page.
Some businesses advertise for a CFO because it sounds like the kind of senior hire a growing business should be making, when what they actually need is a strong FD who will get the basics genuinely right. That mismatch tends to produce one of two outcomes. Either the business appoints someone whose experience and ambitions are pitched at a strategic level, and that person becomes frustrated fairly quickly because the actual day-to-day demands of the role are operational rather than strategic. Or the business pays a premium for seniority it did not need and does not fully use.
The opposite mistake is just as common and arguably more expensive. A business keeps calling the role an FD position long after the demands of the job have outgrown it. The finance lead is still expected to manage the books, but is now also expected to lead an investor process, support a fundraise, or prepare the business for a sale, without the experience, support or seniority the situation actually calls for. This is usually where things go wrong quietly. The reporting starts to lag. The board starts asking questions the finance lead cannot answer with confidence. Investors notice before management does.
A simpler way to think about it
Rather than starting with the title, it tends to work better to start with what the business actually needs from this person over the next two to three years. If the honest answer is mostly about getting the finance function disciplined, accurate and well run, that is an FD job and should be resourced and paid as one. If the honest answer involves fundraising, M&A, investor relationships or genuinely shaping commercial strategy, that is a CFO job, and trying to deliver it through an FD-level hire, however capable, is asking someone to do a job they were never actually appointed to do.
It is also worth being honest about the fact that businesses move between these two needs as they grow, sometimes more than once. A finance leader who was the right CFO for a fifteen million pound business is not automatically the right CFO for the same business at eighty million. The job changes underneath the title, and the team needs revisiting as a result, not because anyone did anything wrong but because growth changes what the role actually requires.
Getting this right matters more than it might first appear, because finance is one of the few functions where the consequences of a mismatch are not just internal. Investors, lenders and acquirers all form a view of a business partly through the credibility of its finance leadership. A scaling business that has thought clearly about whether it needs an FD or a CFO, and has hired accordingly, tends to present better in every one of those conversations than one that has simply promoted a title without changing what sits underneath it.
At Fram Professionals we work with growth companies and investor-backed businesses on senior finance appointments, including the FD to CFO transition that so many scaling businesses go through. If it would help to talk through where your finance function sits right now and what it might need next, we would be glad to help.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Fram Professionals provides leadership and organisational advisory services and does not offer regulated financial advice.
Building a leadership team?
Share this Post